WHEN A CRIMINAL WITH AN ILLEGAL FIREARM IS FACING ONE OF THE TWO ABOVE CHOICES TO REACH HIS GOAL OF KILLING AS MANY KIDS AS POSSIBLE WHICH ONE DO YOU THINK HE WILL TAKE? LIBERALS ACTUALLY BELIEVE THAT ARMED CRIMINALS WILL OBEY LIBERAL GUN LAWS. A PERSON WITH COMMON SENSE KNOWS BETTER, BUT THEN LIBERALS ALWAYS TRY TO COMPLICATE THE OBVIOUS.BELOW IS A COMMENT LEFT ON ONE OF MY SITES ON THE GUN CONTROL ISSUE:
banned has left a new comment on your post "Support Stronger Guns Laws and Provide Criminals w...": UK is virtually gun-free using gun crime as the excuse to legislate. It hasn't stopped maniac shooters either random or multiple (nor genetal ctims come to that). In 2010 a lone shooter killed 10 people in Cumbria England http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumbria_shootings The only reason that it was not worse is that the authorities were able to (illegaly) call for assistance from the ARMED guards at the nearby Winscale nuclear plant. Posted by banned to TOTUS: Conservative Political Commentary at December 18, 2012 11:58 PM
STOP OBAMA! Stop Obama's Second Term Agenda WIDGET. FOLLOW LINK FOR DETAILS.